This post is old news – Get fresh benchmarks at VPS Showdown (daily updates!)
Linode vs. Digital Ocean, performance benchmarks
I mentioned the in my last Linode vs. Digital Ocean
post that I would be doing a performance comparison of the two in the near
future and here it is! I used sysbench
with some pretty basic settings to
compare a 2GB server from both hosting companies. Apples to apples, both plans
weigh in at 20$ a month and are pretty comparable when looking at what you get
for the money. Both servers are running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (64-bit) and were brand
new servers (no upgrades applied). The Linode server was configured with 512MB
of RAM and the Digital Ocean server with none (as configuring a swap partition
is not part of their setup interface).
Before I started, I did install sysbench
and mysql-server
:
sudo apt-get install sysbench mysql-server
CPU
sysbench --test=cpu run
Linode | Digital Ocean | |
---|---|---|
Number of Events | 10000 | 10000 |
Execution Time | 11.7520s | 14.6590s |
Min. Request | 1.16ms | 1.32ms |
Avg. Request | 1.18ms | 1.47ms |
Max. Request | 1.80ms | 2.92ms |
Memory (Read)
sysbench --test=memory run
Linode | Digital Ocean | |
---|---|---|
Number of Events | 104857600 | 104857600 |
Execution Time | 316.8781s | 286.5839s |
Min. Request | 0.00ms | 0.00ms |
Avg. Request | 0.00ms | 0.00ms |
Max. Request | 1.18ms | 1.07ms |
MB/sec | 241.71 | 265.55 |
Memory (Write)
sysbench --test=memory --memory-oper=write run
Linode | Digital Ocean | |
---|---|---|
Number of Events | 104857600 | 104857600 |
Execution Time | 327.8409s | 303.7926s |
Min. Request | 0.00ms | 0.00ms |
Avg. Request | 0.00ms | 0.00ms |
Max. Request | 0.90ms | 5.38ms |
MB/sec | 235.96 | 254.30 |
File I/O
sysbench --test=fileio --file-total-size=4G prepare sysbench --test=fileio --file-total-size=4G --file-test-mode=rndrw run sysbench --test=fileio --file-total-size=4G cleanup
Linode | Digital Ocean | |
---|---|---|
Number of Events | 10000 | 10000 |
Execution Time | 0.1041s | 0.1583s |
Min. Request | 0.01ms | 0.01ms |
Avg. Request | 0.01ms | 0.02ms |
Max. Request | 0.06ms | 0.21ms |
Requests/sec | 7144.83 | 3503.19 |
MySQL
sysbench --test=oltp --oltp-table-size=1000000 --mysql-db=test --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=password prepare sysbench --test=oltp --oltp-table-size=1000000 --mysql-db=test --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=password run sysbench --test=oltp --oltp-table-size=1000000 --mysql-db=test --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=password cleanup
Linode | Digital Ocean | |
---|---|---|
Number of Events | 10000 | 10000 |
Execution Time | 29.5509s | 57.0191s |
Min. Request | 2.21ms | 2.97ms |
Avg. Request | 2.96ms | 5.70ms |
Max. Request | 87.60ms | 1003.54ms |
Read/write Requests/sec | 6417.08 | 3326.50 |
Conclusion
Obviously YMMV when running the same tests (hence providing the commands) but from where I’m sitting, Linode performs considerably better in nearly every category. Digital Ocean fared better in both reading and writing from memory but at the end of the day, you will most likely be leveraging all aspects of the server and not just RAM. Digital Ocean still wins out when you need an inexpensive server (as their plans start at 5$) but I’m not sure that I would rely on them when attempting to scale up your infrastructure.
As always, if you are interested in signing up for either of these companies, please please please sign up with my referral link for Linode and/or DigitalOcean.
If you have found these posts informative and helpful in searching for a new hosting provider, please consider using one of the links below when signing up:
- DigitalOcean, new accounts receive $200 in credit (good for 60 days)
- Linode, new accounts receive $100 in credit (also good for 60 days)
- UpCloud, new accounts receive €25 in credit (yes, that’s in Euros)
- Vultr, new accounts also receive $100 in credit (good for only 14 days)