Linode vs. DigitalOcean

I’ve been seeing a lot of these posts popping up recently and figured I’d weigh in on the matter. Since everyone seems to be including benchmarks of disk I/O
and such I’ll not only omit those, but I’d like to discuss the services offered and some of my perceptions after moving from a Linode 512 to a 512MB Droplet.


Obviously DigitalOcean is offering a better pricing structure than Linode.
Linode 512 with backup comes out to 24.95$ per month while DigitalOcean’s 512MB Droplet is a mere 5$ including their backup plan.


Linode offers a backup service performing daily and weekly backups as well as on the fly snapshots for a fee (5$ a month on the Linode 512). DigitalOcean offers a backup plan which is presumably free as I was not prompted about an additional charge. Linode’s backups are reliable and I have had experience restoring them successfully (I did run into an issue once which I will discuss in a future post, long story short Linode made good). At this point, I have not restored a DigitalOcean backup but I have noticed that the daily snapshots are unreliable as every couple of days no backup is generated. I have not taken this to them yet because everyone I’m hosting on DigitalOcean are basic sites and all the code lives out in GitHub.

Server Monitoring

As long as I’ve been with Linode (since 2009) there has always been a dashboard with usage graphs. Nothing of the sort seems to exist on DigitalOcean at this time.


Linode has provided me with a solid hosting experience, but also a secure one.
The servers are not managed so I’m in charge of server security, but Linode has
some tight controls on their administrative interface. Such security includes only allowing trusted IP addresses to gain access to the administrative side of
things. DigitalOcean does not provide such security. I try to be security cautious, so I love this feature.

Load Balancer

Linode has something called Node Balancers, it’s their LBAAS (load balancer…
you know the rest). DigitalOcean does not provide provide anything similar outside of setting up a new Droplet and running your own load balancer yourself. Linode’s Node Balancers are 19.95$ per month, so comparatively speaking rolling a new Droplet would be cheaper. Personally I like to offload as much of the server administration as I can so an LBAAS is a better choice. From a technology standpoint, the Linode Node Balancer requires all the backend servers to live in the same data center, so you’re at a loss if you want to route users through a load balancer back to a server closest to them.


No brainer here, Linode has 6 data centers while DigitalOcean only has 2. Living in Florida, I opt for Linode’s Atlanta servers as they are closest to me. The
closest DigitalOcean data center is in New York.

Perceived Speed

As mentioned, I did not run any benchmarks so none will be provided here (Google it, there’s a lot them out there). I would like to mention that the time to set up a Droplet and the perceived speed while connecting and installing software seemed significantly faster than that of Linode. This very well could be due to how new the company still is and how light the load on their network is at this point. I’d also like to point out that a lot of the benchmarks I saw out there were comparing a Linode running a 32-bit OS while their Droplet was running 64-bit. Obviously not apples to apples IMO. I am personally running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 32-bit.

Operating Systems

Both companies offer a myriad of operating system options both 32-bit and
64-bit. Linode still recommends running 32-bit while DigitalOcean doesn’t seem
to give any recommendation as to which is better suited. As mentioned, I stuck
with Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 32-bit just so that all of my servers were the same (I did
not leave Linode, I simply moved some of my smaller sites from a Linode 512 to a 512MB Droplet just to give them a shot). One thing that struck me as peculiar is that on DigitalOcean I found myself installing packages that I don’t remember installing on Linode, specifically vim and telnet. Not a big deal, but caught me off guard as those packages aren’t part of my standard setup scripts.


From what I’ve read, most reviewers have dismissed the fact that Linode offers 4 cores and DigitalOcean only offers 1. Just seems like a no brainer that there’s
an advantage by having more cores especially considering that many packages do take advantage of the additional cores (nginx, fastcgi/fpm, memcached).

Amendment 03/01/2013: I’m not sure if I missed this originally or if it was recently added, but DigitalOcean does offer plans with additional cores. I’m quite impressed as they are maxing out at 24 cores on their largest plan. Linode has always been 4 cores on all plans (and no way to add in additional cores as an extra).


Keep in mind, I don’t actually use it, but Linode offers StackScripts for automating server builds. From what I saw DigitalOcean did not have such a system, but they do have an API (as does Linode).

Referral Program

Linode has an exceptional referral program and thus far I’ve earned over 200$ in referral credits. DigitalOcean does not have a consumer level referral program but according to their site they use Commission Junction. Obviously not ideal, especially when you do like something and want to kick all your friends a link after pestering them to switch.

Track Record

Linode has a pretty strong track record of upgrading what a plan includes
without changing the price of the plan. It wouldn’t surprise me if DigitalOcean
were to increase their rates once their name is a bit more established. Also, as
a Tech Stars graduate, there is a high liklihood that the company will end up
being flipped in the next few years and who knows what would happen to the
pricing then. Also, having scaled a website to over 11m PV/m on Linode, I’m
confident that they are a proven hosting provider (especially considering they
had to make some infrastructure exceptions for one of my servers). There’s a
reason I keep the Linode logo in the footer of my sites hosted there.


From what I’ve experienced, DigitalOcean doesn’t seem like a bad option especially if you’re cost conscious on the matter. Personally, it’s too early
for me to drop Linode. Even if slower, Linode is still offering a more complete
and stable infratructure which justifies the price in my eyes. I did receive 20$
in credit from DigitalOcean and am planning on sticking with them for at least
the next 4 months assuming nothing catastrophic occurs.

If you have found these posts informative and helpful in searching for a new hosting provider, please consider using one of the links below when signing up:

  • DigitalOcean, new accounts receive $200 in credit (good for 60 days)
  • Linode, new accounts receive $100 in credit (also good for 60 days)
  • Vultr, new accounts also receive $100 in credit (good for only 14 days)
  • UpCloud, new accounts receive €25 in credit (yes, that’s in Euros)
Josh Sherman - The Man, The Myth, The Avatar

About Josh

Husband. Father. Pug dad. Musician. Founder of Holiday API, Head of Engineering and Emoji Specialist at Mailshake, and author of the best damn Lorem Ipsum Library for PHP.

If you found this article helpful, please consider buying me a coffee.