$10 Showdown: Linode vs. DigitalOcean vs. Amazon Lightsail

Yes, Linode announced a $5 plan. You can check out the $5 Showdown: Linode
vs. DigitalOcean vs. Lightsail vs. Vultr

Yes #2, Linode made some changes to their $10 plan, increasing the storage a
bit and kicking up their network out. I have updated the post to reflect the
network changes.

Amazon caught me off guard this week with a VPS offering that mirrors the
pricing of DigitalOcean and potentially rivals the quality of
Linode.

Curious how things compared, I am revisiting my last Linode vs.
DigitalOcean post from July 2016 and bringing Lightsail in the mix.

Let the best VPS win!

Overview

Even though Lightsail is offering a 5 dollar plan, Linode does not. Because of
this, I am comparing hosting plans at the 10 dollar price point. Also, all of
the benchmarks were generated on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS system.

If simply comparing plans, Linode wins if you need more RAM but lacks in storage
compared to both DigitalOcean and Amazon Lightsail.

What’s interesting to note is that Lightsail’s network overage is 4.5x that of
Linode and DigitalOcean. If you only need a server for a couple of hours,
Lightsail’s pricing is a few fractions of a cent better.

Unfortunately, I don’t have a reliable number for Amazon’s network throughput
for Lightsail. There is a network comparison later on though, so all is not
lost.

CPU

sysbench --test=cpu run

Lightsail is off to a good start clocking in a full second below Linode and even
moreso against DigitalOcean.

Memory (read)

sysbench --test=memory run

Linode reads from memory twice as fast as DigitalOcean and Lightsail ended up a
distant 2nd to Linode. Perhaps something to be said about having more RAM?

Memory (write)

sysbench --test=memory --memory-oper=write run

Aside from DigitalOcean, the other hosting providers showed write speeds
consistent with the read speeds. What’s interesting is that Amazon’s maximum
request was absurdly low compared to Linode yet somehow couldn’t process as many
megabytes per second.

File I/O

sysbench --test=fileio prepare
sysbench --test=fileio --file-test-mode=rndrw run
sysbench --test=fileio cleanup

Linode’s SSD is nearly twice as fast as DigitalOcean’s. DigitalOcean’s SSD is
more than double the speed of Amazon Lightsail’s.

Question is, do you want more space or faster disk access?

OLTP with MySQL

mysql -uroot -e "CREATE DATABASE sbtest;"
sysbench --test=oltp --oltp-table-size=1000000 --mysql-user=root prepare
sysbench --test=oltp --oltp-table-size=1000000 --mysql-user=root run
sysbench --test=oltp --oltp-table-size=1000000 --mysql-user=root cleanup

Amazon performed better than DigitalOcean but not nearly as well as Linode.
Amazon had slightly better minimum request time but the maximum request time was
double that of DigitalOcean’s. Linode’s min and max request times have a
significantly tighter range.

Network

Network speed benchmarks are generated by speedtest-cli.

Out of the gate, DigitalOcean touts a significantly faster network and I don’t
have any numbers for Amazon Lightsail. If anybody knows what Amazon is offering
network-wise with Lightsail, please comment below.

SpeedTest.net picks different servers each time, so it’s hard to get an apples
to apples comparison. Amazon’s download speed was pretty horribad
compared to both DigitalOcean and Linode. Upload on the otherhand, Linode
followed by DigitalOcean were neck and neck with Amazon bringing up the rear.

Conclusion

Not too far off from my previous posts, Linode seems to be the all around best
bet. DigitalOcean and Amazon Lightsail are for the most part equivalent at the
10 dollar price point.

Between DigitalOcean and Lightsail, you would need to prioritize between memory
and file I/O. Based on Amazon’s overage pricing, I would favor DigitalOcean.

A couple of non-benchmark things worth mentioning. First, and perhaps this is
more of a self-serving sentiment, but Amazon does not offer any sort of
affiliate program for Lightsail or any other of their web services.

The other thing is that Amazon does not offer free DNS hosting. Their service is
negligibly priced at 40 cents per million queries. I have no idea how many DNS
queries per month any of my sites do. I do know that I don’t spend anything on
DNS hosting with Linode or DigitalOcean or even CloudFlare.

Amendment I ended up focusing on the fact that Amazon is charging at all for
DNS and failed to realize that you do get up to 3 DNS zones and unlimited
records for free. You get 3 million queries per month and anything above that is
$0.40 per million queries. Still not entirely free but based on your DNS volume
it is probably sufficient.

As always, your mileage may vary based on your own requirements. As for me, I’m
still happy with Linode and Amazon’s recent VPS offering doesn’t sway me at all.

If you happen to find this post helpful when deciding on your next hosting
solution, I’ll love you forever if you sign up using my referral links for
Linode and DigitalOcean.

As mentioned, Amazon doesn’t do the whole affiliate thing, but you could grab me
something cheap from my Amazon Wish List or even better, be a real
MVP and make a donation to the Wounded Warrior Project.

And as always if you end up signing up, hit me up on Twitter and let
me know about it!