As promised, I am trying to get a new VPS Showdown post out on a monthly basis.
I wasn’t sure if I was going to do them at the beginning of each month or not,
but I am glad I waited as DigitalOcean shook things up by doubling their RAM
offerings and bumped a few other stats.
Now DigitalOcean, Linode and Vultr offer the same amount of RAM at the same
price points!
Just like last month, I went ahead and spun up 3 servers for DigitalOcean,
Linode and Vultr at both the 5$ and 20$ price points. All of the servers were
running Ubuntu 16.04 LTS x64 and around the same vicinity of New York City /
Newark, New Jersey.
The data shown is the average of the results.
I’ve also normalized the stats a bit better so I wouldn’t have to field a bunch
of comments letting me know that 1 GB is the same as 1024 MB. Hey, it’s not my
fault that each hosting company uses a different dialect of marketing speak 😉
$5 Showdown
| DigitalOcean | Linode | Vultr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Location | New York 1 | Newark, NJ | New York (NJ) |
| RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| CPU | 1 Core | 1 Core | 1 Core |
| SSD | 25 GB | 20 GB | 25 GB |
| Transfer | 1 TB | 1TB | 1 TB |
| CPU (time taken) (seconds) | 15.2390 | 12.5243 | 13.02643 |
| Memory (Read) (MB/sec) | 1476.54 | 2210.50 | 2007.96 |
| Memory (Write) (MB/sec) | 1481.69 | 2204.90 | 2022.00 |
| File I/O (MB/sec) | 77.030 | 58.709 | 59.202 |
| MySQL (Read/write) (req/sec) | 3784.87 | 7409.49 | 5300.14 |
| ab (req/sec) (mean) | 1188.10 | 1204.38 | 2085.78 |
| ab (transfer rate) (Kbytes/sec) | 13108.23 | 13217.78 | 23379.82 |
Linode put up great numbers in almost all of the categorie with the exceptions
of file I/O and ab. Vultr’s marketing is always talking about
network speed so it’s not too surprising for them to perform better there.
DigitalOcean may have taken the fil I/O but it’s worth nothing that Linode and
Vultr both performed consistent across each server instance while DigitalOcean
had one instance that performed wildly better than the other two (bringing up
the average considerably).
Vultr used to be the frontrunner in regard to their SSD offering, but since
DigitalOcean’s pricing changes, they are now tied.
$20 Showdown
| DigitalOcean | Linode | Vultr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Location | New York 1 | Newark, NJ | New York (NJ) |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| CPU | 2 Cores | 2 Cores | 2 Cores |
| SSD | 80 GB | 48 GB | 60 GB |
| Transfer | 4 TB | 4 TB | 4 TB |
| CPU (time taken) (seconds) | 15.9424 | 12.5850 | 12.8183 |
| Memory (Read) (MB/sec) | 1039.30 | 2184.88 | 2126.74 |
| Memory (Write) (MB/sec) | 1035.82 | 2171.47 | 2137.90 |
| File I/O (MB/sec) | 90.969 | 132.933 | 104.231 |
| MySQL (Read/write) (req/sec) | 3988.07 | 7870.39 | 6215.92 |
| ab (req/sec) (mean) | 1249.92 | 1138.23 | 2164.41 |
| ab (transfer rate) (Kbytes/sec) | 13842.98 | 12346.76 | 24569.35 |
Unlike the 5$ tier, DigitalOcean’s new 20$ plan didn’t tie Vultr’s SSD offering
but blew it out of the water!
Vultr continued to reign supreme with the ab tests and even though they didn’t
take any other categories, they were just a hair behind Linode for most of them.
Just like the 5$ tier, I had one DigitalOcean droplet that performed drastically
different than the other two. Vultr and Linode both performed fairly consistent
across each of the instances I was running.
Conclusion
Even though DigitalOcean is now offering more for the same price, the data is
still in favor of Linode and Vultr.
But as always, it really depends on what you need.
If you’re looking at the data above, Linode’s the clear choice as they excel is
just about every category.
Worried about network speed? Vultr’s got you covered while also offering a bit
more storage space.
And if storage space if your major concern, DigitalOcean is going to give you
the most bang for your buck.
Regardless of which provider you go with, please don’t forgot about this post
and please please please use one of my referral links below.
Last Valentine’s Day Linode announced a 5$ plan, wonder if they will have
anything in store for us next month!
